RGT, Embattled British Problem Gambling Advocate, Faces Allegations of Nepotism from UK Media

RGT, Em<span id="more-40108"></span>battled British Problem Gambling Advocate, Faces Allegations of Nepotism from UK Media

Jonathan Parke, former mind of commissioning at RGT, now director of Sophoro Ltd.

The accountable Gambling Trust (RGT), the UK’s leading problem advocacy that is gambling, has found itself in the harsh glare of the media limelight again, this time around for allegations of nepotism.

The charity, which is funded by the bookmaking industry to the tune of $5 million per year to research and promote the avoidance of problem gambling, has been under fire in the press that is british for apparent conflicts of great interest. Because of its close ties to the gambling industry, concerns were asked as to whether its scientific studies are completely independent of gaming interests.

The RGT maintains it is impartial. But the revelation this week by the UK’s Independent newspaper that a firm owned by the husband of the charity’s Director of Commissioning, Jane Rigbye, has been granted a research that is lucrative, isn’t helping the cause of credibility for the outfit.

Marital Contracts

According to your Independent, Sophoro Ltd. owned by Rigbye’s spouse Jonathan Parke, was offered a research that is major as part of a £750,000 initiative into the effect of online gaming on problem gambling.

Parke once was mind of commissioning at RGT himself, leading to accusations that he and their wife swapped jobs, then promptly swapped contracts.

Sophoro had been granted the contract in December, the first of two, but until final year the organization was registered during the few’s house, and both Rigbye and Parke were listed as company directors.

Moreover, Sophoro bid for the RGT agreement just two months after Rigbye stepped down as director to take on her brand new part at RGT.

In reaction to the news, Labour casinopokies777.com shadow gambling minister Clive Efford said RGT ‘should be disbanded’ if its research was found to protect the ‘interests of the industry at the expense of people who have gambling problems.’

Goulden Steps Down

RGT has long been accused of being too sympathetic to the industry, and in particular for its refusal to denounce fixed-odds terminals that are bettingFOBTs) in bookmaking shops.

Last thirty days, Neil Goulden, the trust’s chairman, stepped criticism that is down following The Guardian newspaper that while chair of RGT, he was also a chair of the industry lobby team known as the Association of British Bookmakers (ABB). The jobs had been held concurrently between 2012 and mid-2014.

Goulden told the Guardian that his participation with RGT, while the participation of the industry as whole, was integral to investigating and ultimately understanding issue gambling.

‘[Bookmakers] would not have released data or have taken the actions it continues to consume prevention of harm without my influence that is personal and,’ he said.

RGT, which will be examined by the charity regulator throughout the Sophoro event, told the Independent that Rigbye had no say in commissioning of research agreements.

DraftKings Appeals New York AG Lawsuit, Filing Says Empire State Must Ban Spelling Bees

New York AG Eric Schneiderman, who has been accused by DraftKings of earning mistakes in his lawsuit against DFS sites. (Image: pokerhomegames.com)

DraftKings has launched its appeal against the nyc State injunction that is preliminary seeks to ban day-to-day fantasy sports (DFS) and place an end to its operations in the Empire State.

The DFS operator’s 67-page filing brings no punches, accusing nyc Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of appropriate misapprehensions that ‘did perhaps not come close to carrying the responsibility’ of proof that DFS isn’t game of skill.

It further accuses the court of ‘abusing its discernment’ in siding with Schneiderman.

‘The court applied the incorrect appropriate standard, and ignored the undisputed proof, to locate that daily fantasy sports contests are games of chance,’ the company argued in its filing.

Can be An Entry Fee A bet?

In December, Justice Manuel Mendez granted the AG’s injunction, ordering DraftKings and FanDuel to cease operations in New York State, its market that is second-biggest after.

DraftKings immediately filed a motion that is expedited remain the court’s choice pending the outcome of its appeal. This was upheld by a Court of Appeals judge that same afternoon, permitting the companies to continue business temporarily in nyc until the scenario is remedied.

In his December ruling, Mendez was in fact necessary to determine whether DFS was a game of skill or of chance, and more particularly, whether setting a line-up was a process that is skill-based an ‘entry cost,’ or an out-and-out ‘wager.’ He decided it was the latter.

‘New York State law that is penal not refer to ‘wagering’ or ‘betting,’ rather it states that someone, ‘risks something of value,” he said. ‘The re payment of an ‘entry fee’ because high as $10,600 on a single or more contests daily could be deemed risking certainly ‘something of value.’ ‘

Dog Shows and Bass Fishing

DraftKings’ appeal filing claims that when this had been the case, then ‘dog shows and spelling bees, yachting tournaments and bass fishing’ should really be ‘criminalized’ under Judge Mendez’s ruling. Each of those are events entry that is requiring whose outcome is susceptible to a component of possibility, argues the DraftKings filing.

‘Daily fantasy sports are skill-based games being, and should be, legal,’ DraftKings’ attorney David Boies said in a declaration. ‘DraftKings contests are no less legal than season-long fantasy sports, which the Attorney General has repeatedly conceded are legal.’

In January, Schneiderman amended their lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel to look for the return of all buy-ins compensated by ny residents paid to both organizations throughout 2015, plus a $5,000 fine per head.

This would constitute hundreds of millions of dollars in buy-ins, plus around $3 billion in fines with 600,000 DFS customers in the state.

Outrage Over NFL-Owned Children Daily Fantasy Sports Site from Youth Advocacy Group

The NFL kids daily fantasy sports site is dealing with backlash from a few outraged groups, arguing the league shouldn’t be marketing their product to children as early as six years of age. (Image: fantasy.nflrush.com)

Targeted at pre-teen kids, day-to-day fantasy recreations (DFS) site NFL Rush is being asked to stop operations by the non-profit company Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC).

In a story that might appear appropriate for satire, the truth is that the National Football League is catering to children to participate in free DFS contests, with the chance of winning weekly prizes like an XBOX One, video games, and a grand prize of a $5,000 scholarship.

In line with the NFL Rush Fantasy website, ‘US residents between 6 and 12 who have parental consent are eligible.’

Though the league and its commissioner, Roger Goodell, have long publicly opposed sports betting and gambling, it apparently does not have any qualms when it comes to children and fantasy sports. With the National Council on Problem Gambling, the CCFC is calling on Goodell and also the NFL to stop promoting fantasy football to kids.

‘ There is evidence that playing fantasy sports, particularly with the incentive of valuable prizes as offered on the NFL Rush Fantasy app and website, can lead to problem gambling and addiction,’ CCFC Executive Director Josh Golin said in his letter towards the league. ‘It is unconscionable that the NFL encourages kiddies as young as six years old to build up the habit of engaging in this adult activity.’

NFL Hypocrisy?

The NFL has always maintained that any expansion of traditional sports betting could negatively impact the league and compromise the integrity of its games. Surprisingly, it is taken a stance that is rather different daily fantasy contests.

FanDuel has contracts with 15 NFL teams, while Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots owners Jerry Jones and Robert Kraft hold stakes in DraftKings.

DFS differs from sports gambling because of the actual fact that the participant isn’t just picking a team or line, but assembling a roster of players in a process that is known as to be an endeavor that is skill-based.

Multiple solicitors general have ruled that DFS constitutes gambling, utilizing the operators themselves, not interestingly, fighting right back. The data on who routinely wins DFS contests seems to help the ability over luck debate.

But as it applies to children, teaching 6 to 12-year-olds how exactly to assemble a group of players to supply the most effective odds of winning a video game console is certainly cause for concern.

‘By providing these valuable incentives, the NFL is indoctrinating kids into engaging in dream activities with a stake that is financial the end result,’ the CCFC noted. ‘This exposes them, and our communities, to the potential risks of gambling problems.’

You’ve Got to Be Carefully Taught

It must be noted that the NFL hasn’t just promoted an online site: it’s offered an in-classroom curriculum for instructors since well. Launched in 2014, NFL Rush Fantasy Learn, Play, Score! was billed as a mathematics and language arts program based around fantasy sports. The league says that this system wrapped at the conclusion of 2014-2015 period, but in it, kids were encouraged to ‘choose their ultimate fantasy team each week’ through critical thinking.

This program did employ basic math in determining exactly how numerous fantasy points are to be allocated based on the gamer’s performance, however it also required the student to realize the rules of football. Critics of the scheme argued it’s the NFL’s way to engage a brand new audience, as youth soccer involvement continues to decline.

Hey, have you thought to simply teach the value of a dollar with a ‘Let It Rain’ mathematics program as well?

No Safeguards for Guardians

If you’re thinking NFL Rush features a few protections to avoid kids from enrolling by themselves, you are going to be amazed to learn that registrants are merely required to give their parent’s email address, therefore that the NFL can confirm their guardian and age consent.

Clearly no 10-year-old would think to enter their friend’s email or develop a quick Yahoo address to self-confirm their validation, right? Of course not.

From online poker to the emergence of daily dream sports, the primary concern for a lot of legislators is how exactly to best protect adult consumers while gaming on the online, as well as the extremely issue of age verification. However, into the case involving kiddies, the most susceptible and impressionable demographic, small is being done to keep your way-under-18-year-old child from participating in daily fantasy activities.

Interestingly, nobody through the contingent that is pro-RAWA to have jumped with this web site as evidence that children won’t be exempt from gambling online. It’s exactly the type of fodder that Sheldon Adelson and the bill’s other sponsors, like presidential GOP contender Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida), would love to throw in the face of everyone else who supports Internet gaming.